Site icon Studio Humanzee

Show Notes: Speaker Easy

Behind Enemy Lines

Behind Enemy Lines

the mighty humanzee
By The Mighty Humanzee

Did the lights go off?  All the panic over a Speaker of The House should remind us of how much we DON’T need the Federal Government.

What Does OZBert Have To Say?

Did You Ever Hear of the Bronx Boofer?

I thought every time AOC spoke she just filled the room with hot air but I guess her other end emits hot gas.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-do-democrats-keep-farting-camera

She did anything but clear the air… as Twitter followers couldn’t help but notice that during the 45-second livestreamed social-media broadcast, the socialist lawmaker unmistakably appeared to break wind around the 38 second mark.

Elawn, Elawn Likes His Munaaaayyyy

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/x-charges-new-users-1-combat-spam-bots-making-it-1000x-harder-manipulate-platform

X Charges New Users $1 To Combat Spam Bots, Making It “1000X Harder To Manipulate Platform”

OZBert Warned Us

Send More Adderall

FILE PHOTO: Indicted FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried leaves the United States Courthouse in New York City, U.S., July 26, 2023. REUTERS/Amr Alfiky/File Photo

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/lawyers-sam-bankman-fried-petition-judge-more-adderall

Bankman-Fried needs more drugs so he can tell a judge who he stole billions.  Better start a Given Send Go, just don’t tell MI AG Dana Darth Nessel.

Now that we’ve moved past the “identity theft from Thai hookers to pay Chinese bribes” stage of the Sam Bankman-Fried trial news, we can revert back to what’s important: the accused’s incessant need for Adderall.

At least, that’s what it looks like to us after Bankman-Fried’s lawyers pled to the court this weekend for more Adderall so that SBF can continue to “concentrate” during his ongoing trial. 

We’re Calling Them Teams Now

Strange choice of words by Biden, the other team instead of saying Hamas.  Forget the fact that he looks groggy as hell, we can’t identify Hamas?

More Confusion Regarding Hamas

In 2019 Netanyahu advocated for transferring funds to Hamas.  While this does not mean a conspiracy to prop up an enemy and use them for your own gains, it does tell you that the belief of giving money those who hate you will buy their loyalty is a losing proposition.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-10-16/bibi-netanyahu-2019-israel-must-support-bolstering-hamas-and-transferring-money

“Effectively, Netanyahu’s entire worldview collapsed over the course of a single day. He was convinced that he could make deals with corrupt Arab tyrants while ignoring the cornerstone of the Arab-Jewish conflict, the Palestinians. His life’s work was to turn the ship of state from the course steered by his predecessors, from Yitzhak Rabin to Ehud Olmert, and make the two-state solution impossible. En route to this goal, he found a partner in Hamas.

‘Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas,’ he told a meeting of his Likud party’s Knesset members in March 2019. “This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.”

Does this sound familiar?

 

You Better Fund Those Illegals

Biden administration tells banks that they can’t reject applications from illegal immigrants, even though they are a credit risk, may not be who they say they are, and have no collateral to offer.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-admin-orders-banks-not-reject-illegal-immigrants-loan-applications

The two agencies stated that they were issuing the warning “because consumers have reported being rejected for credit cards as well as for auto, student, personal and equipment loans because of their immigration status, even when they have strong credit histories and ties to the United States and are otherwise qualified to receive the loans.”

From the DoJ:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-and-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-issue-joint-statement-cautioning

“Lenders should not deny people the opportunity to take out a loan to buy a home, build their businesses or otherwise pursue their financial goals because of unlawful bias and without regard to their actual ability to repay,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “This guidance reminds lenders that denying someone access to credit based solely on their actual or perceived immigrant status may violate federal law.”

Climate Change and Health Care and Equity – It’s All The Same Thing

https://twitter.com/pvtjokerus/status/1714317245151916269?s=20

Where’s The Speaker?

https://twitter.com/pvtjokerus/status/1714364411509362920?s=20

Cut Down Trees To Save The Planet

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/climate-activists-seek-save-planet-cutting-burying-trees

During The New York Times Climate Forward Summit in September, the billionaire didn’t hesitate to share his thoughts on the role of planting trees to mitigate climate concerns, calling it “complete nonsense.”

In an interview with NY Times reporter David Gelles, Mr. Gates responded dismissively to the idea that planting more trees can reverse adverse climate effects.

“That’s complete nonsense … I mean, are we the science people, or are we the idiots?” Mr. Gates asked rhetorically.

Gag Order Issued Against Trump

https://thefederalist.com/2023/10/17/hate-trump-all-you-like-the-gag-order-is-still-wrong/

In the name of fairness, Chutkan contends that Trump does not enjoy unfettered First Amendment rights because he might intimidate witnesses. It’s already illegal to intimidate witnesses. Charge him if he does it. Laws already exist to cover all the other premises Smith has used to rationalize the gag order.

Establishment media informs us that the gag order is just “narrow” and meant to “protect the integrity of the trial and the jury pool.” In her Solomonic wisdom, Chutkan cut the state’s request in half. A “narrow” gag order limiting free speech is still a gag order limiting free speech. The fact that Smith was seeking even broader limitations only makes Trump’s claims more plausible.

Exit mobile version