Site icon Studio Humanzee

Show Notes: Exi, Effuge Planetam Carceris

By The Mighty Humanzee

We scoffed at Britain for wanting to blot out the sun’s light to combat climate change, but did you realize a crypto billionaire, the state of California, and NOAA funded and conducted test BUT DID NOT REVEAL it to the public to avoid a panic? We’ll also dig deeper into cloud seeding and the Bro-ligarch who thinks that is a good idea for us as well. Finally we’ll cover the AI Action Plan, which will emphasize that the DoD and ODNI monitor our adoption of AI compared with other countries. It appears that AI is not only in our future, but it will be our primary future.

Interesting how these things are pushed without our consent.

 

AI Action Plan

  • Frontier Models = Big Compute
  • DeepSeek demonstrated that we do NOT need as much compute for training
    • This is a threat to the Frontier Models
  • Big Compute = Energy
  • Streamline Data Center Construction
    • Eminent Domain?
    • Water Impact
  • Securing AI, Does This Mean Digital ID
    • You Need to be Identified If You Will Do Bad Things
  • Due to national security considerations, DoD and ODNI will monitor AI adoption and compare with international competitors
    • Why?
  • Encourage use in all sectors, jump start healthcare.
    • AI has been used for XRay and MRI evaluation
    • What other areas re administration
    • Does this mean AI for diagnosis and recommendations over training of people?
  • Mike Rowe – we need 500,000 electricians.  When and where do we address this, and why do Bro-ligarchs just ignore?

Ignoring a Decades Old Crisis Ends When the Bro-ligarchs Take Note

Reprioritize Energy Use For National Security

Ignore Copyright For National Security

Ownership protected for Global Corpos who left the US, but not for those whose works have been pilfered.

Govt as a Client For Cloud Seeding, A Bro-ligarch Client

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/what-know-about-cloud-seeding

Amid the rescue and recovery efforts, some blamed the deadly floods on cloud seeding company Rainmaker Technology Corporation and its CEO Augustus Doricko, who received death threats after his company’s cloud seeding operation 130 miles from the flood area on July 2 caught the attention of the public.

Cloud seeding is the act of making existing cumulus clouds rain over a particular area that would not have done so otherwise. It doesn’t add moisture to the atmosphere.

Water is a public good,” he said.

“There are farms and ecosystems and residential utilities and hydroelectric utilities and industries, all of whom demand water. And the water that comes from cloud seeding, it doesn’t come into pipes and go to one specific house; it precipitates over a watershed, and then that water runs off into the rivers and everybody draws it from the reservoirs or the aquifers. And so it’s natural that a lot of our customers are the government,” Doricko added.

Dimming the sun like that is another real technology that we need to take very seriously,” he said. “It’s not cloud seeding. It does also happen in the atmosphere, but otherwise it’s not related to cloud seeding in any capacity.”

What Type of Reasoning Is This?  If a service can be provided by government, it also can be denied.  Based on political views.  Like we saw in North Carolina during Helene

  • Cloud seeding does not direct water to individual households through pipes; instead, it causes precipitation over a watershed, with the resulting water flowing into rivers and being drawn from reservoirs or aquifers by everyone.
  • This widespread impact means that various entities, including farms, ecosystems, residential utilities, hydroelectric utilities, and industries, all demand water. Therefore, it is natural for governments to be the primary customers for cloud seeding services.
  • Furthermore, cloud seeding can have interstate effects, such as increasing snowpack in Colorado benefiting Utah, New Mexico, and other states in the Colorado River Basin. This leads to interstate and potentially federal collaboration and oversight, as lower basin states like California, Nevada, and Arizona already fund cloud seeding operations in upper region states because they benefit from the increased snowpack.

Dimming the Sun For The Greater Good

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/27/california-sunlight-dimming-experiment-collapse-00476983

University of Washington’s Marine Cloud Brightening Program, in collaboration with SilverLining and SRI International. The experiment, conducted on a retired aircraft carrier (USS Hornet) in Alameda, California, was designed as a small-scale test (lasting only about 20 minutes) for technology that sprays salt water to create clouds. The ultimate, much larger goal of this research is to develop methods for dimming the sun’s rays to counter Earth’s warming.

 

Not a small operation – they used a retired aircraft carrier.

A team of researchers in California drew notoriety last year with an aborted experiment on a retired aircraft carrier that sought to test a machine for creating clouds.  

In response to questions, University of Washington officials downplayed the magnitude of the proposed experiment and its potential to change weather patterns. Instead, they focused on the program’s goal of showing that the instruments for making clouds could work in a real-world setting. They also pushed back on critics’ assertions that they were operating secretively, noting that team members had previously disclosed the potential for open-ocean testing in scientific papers.

Meanwhile, more than 575 scientists have called for a ban on geoengineering development because it “cannot be governed globally in a fair, inclusive, and effective manner.” And in Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a law last month that bans the injection or release of chemicals into the atmosphere “for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.”

The primary reason for the experiment’s collapse was a significant failure by researchers to notify and engage with local officials and the public beforehand. Alameda city officials, including Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft, learned about the test only through media reports, leading them to swiftly shut it down. They cited a lack of prior consultation and the program’s potential violation of the Hornet’s lease, which was intended solely for museum-related activities. Internal documents reveal that the researchers deliberately aimed to “avoid scaring” the public and carefully controlled information, even instructing staff not to mention the Alameda study to a visiting reporter. This secrecy drew strong criticism from solar geoengineering experts who emphasized the importance of community engagement.

These efforts are also backed by Tech Bros, such as cryptocurrency billionaire Chris Larsen, the philanthropist Rachel Pritzker and Chris Sacca, a venture capitalist who has appeared on Shark Tank and other TV shows. 

Avoid Scaring Them

 

Chris Larsen, Tech Bro Who Cares About Climate And Wants Carbon Removal

https://llccf.org/

 

Exit mobile version