Infructure, Your Honor! The witness withheld Exacaliberatory evidence
Remember high school and “homosayswhat?!??”
Or how ordering takeout “Wang, I’ll take the #3 CreamSumYunGuy. Thanks.”
Barr Protection Agency
In 2018, the feds launched an investigation into Hunter Biden, which the son of the now-president publicly disclosed in December 2020, following his father’s election. On Tuesday, news broke that Hunter Biden had agreed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax counts and had entered a pretrial diversion agreement on a separate firearms count, unleashing outrage from the right over the absence of any money-laundering or bribery counts. But even worse is the U.S. attorney’s failure to file these charges against the Biden son in 2019, which suggests shielding Joe Biden from scandal is the operative principle of the Department of Justice and FBI.
Humper earned 1.5 million in 2017, paid ZERO taxes.
DoJ field NO charges in 2019. Slow walking hand of injustice. This lays at Bill Barr’s feet.
Gun felony against Humper is dismissed if he remains “drug free”.
But remember Biden was the one after Sandy Hook who insisted that lying on background check was a felony and should be thoroughly punished.
In a Google “fireside chat” at the time, Biden noted that it was vital to “enforce the existing laws we have” and repeated numerous times the importance of shoring up background checks. Obama would come back to Biden’s reform suggestions on numerous occasions over the years, promising to look into “what kinds of authorities do we have to enforce the laws that we have in place more effectively to keep guns out of the hands of criminals.”
Normally the punishment for lying is:
In accordance with Biden’s former devotion to “maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime,” Hunter’s actions deserve punishment to the fullest extent of the law, which is up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Art For Sale:
What Other President’s Son Painted?
Contest for you guys in the chat
Forget Two Tiered Justice System Moniker, We have Banana Republic Lawlessness
“And that leads to calamitous situations like this, which are very disruptive and hurt any political causes he’s associated with.
“This was a case entirely of his own making,” Barr added.
Barr said that Trump had “no legal right” to the documents, and applauded the government for its efforts to get the documents back “quietly and with respect,” which Barr said was “essential” to the case.
Trump Talked To Mr Meat-sweats, Not Good
Science Is Made Stronger By Debate and Asking Questions
Joe Rogan First Challenged Peter Hotez to Debate RFK Jr on the Science of Vaccines in 2019, But He Declined...— Kathie (@TheCrimsonWorm) June 18, 2023
"He's an attorney and he's very clever and he knows how to do arguments in court. And what am I? I'm a scientist." pic.twitter.com/oJuXudzsux
YouTube removes Jordan Petersen video of RFK Jr vaccine discussion.
No, platforms shouldn’t censor candidates but they censored a sitting President, remember?
What do you think ... Should social media platforms censor presidential candidates? My conversation with @JordanBPeterson was deleted by @YouTube. Luckily you can watch it here on @Twitter (thank you @elonmusk). #Kennedy24https://t.co/PJFKWH6zmd— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 18, 2023